* amunizp <a75...@alumni.tecnun.es> [2016-11-17 13:57:09 +0000]: > Sounds good. Where would 'open core' or 'open surface' fall?
The idea is to have something more useful than such labels. E.g. a part of the offer could be proprietary because it is a connector to a proprietary software not important for the functionality, and you legally cannot publish it under a Free Software license. That should not be on the same level as important pieces of functionality missing. Regards, Matthias -- Matthias Kirschner - President - Free Software Foundation Europe Schönhauser Allee 6/7, 10119 Berlin, Germany | t +49-30-27595290 Registered at Amtsgericht Hamburg, VR 17030 | (fsfe.org/join) Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner) - Weblog (k7r.eu/blog.html) _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
