What he said :-). Using a /16 is guaranteed to come back and bite you in the posterior at some later stage. Go to a /22 if you're worried about running out.
Greg ________________________________ From: Aarno Aukia [aarnoau...@gmail.com] Sent: 03 April 2009 13:33 To: discussion@pfsense.com; eu...@leitl.org Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] extending LAN private network Yes, altough you could move to 192.168.0.0/23<http://192.168.0.0/23> first, already doubling the number of usable addresses... -Aarno On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 13:25, Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org<mailto:eu...@leitl.org>> wrote: It seems I'll be running out of LAN addresses on the local 192.168.0.0/24<http://192.168.0.0/24> soon. Is boosting it as easy as moving to 192.168.0.0/16<http://192.168.0.0/16> on the LAN tab, and adjusting the netmask for all the hosts? Or am I overlooking something? -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com<mailto:discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com> For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com<mailto:discussion-h...@pfsense.com> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org -- Aarno Aukia ETH Zurich / Atrila GmbH +41764000464
