> > This might correct that the way we are progressing with "one > off" bug fixes > and a tendency towards struts as an assumed underlying framework >
Is display tag development heading in the direction of coupling it with struts? I think it would be a mistake to tie the display tag to struts (or any underlying framework for that matter). If this is not what you meant, I apologize. Just my 2 cents worth, -Jay > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin Simpson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 8:14 AM > To: displayTag > Subject: Re: [displaytag-devel] Whither Future Development > after 0.8.5? > > > Well put John. I am +1 for this approach. What permissions > in SourceForge > are necessary to make the modules appear ("directed to any > seasoned Source > Forge Admin")? If I have sufficient permissions and group > consent, I will > go ahead and make modules for John, Myself and any others who want to > participate. > > I further propose that if you are willing to put your refactorings out > there, they should only be considered if sufficient documentation and > examples accompany them. A readme, buildme, seeme and whyme > set of files? > Get me? > > This might correct that the way we are progressing with "one > off" bug fixes > and a tendency towards struts as an assumed underlying framework > > Ben > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en _______________________________________________ displaytag-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel
