+1 for removing them in the existing code, but this is pretty low priority +1 for displaytag-1.0-b1
as far as removing the display09 from sourceforge? I'm not even sure what the sourceforge policy is, should we keep it or just get rid of it? I suppose it's just additional clutter at this point unless the history is needed. I'll try and get an FTP account setup for displaytag.org, so that we can get the examples updated. Who should I give access to the FTP account? project admins? or should I just plan to update it each time? John On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Fabrizio Giustina wrote: > > Ok, prefixes in code convention are gone, I think no one likes them. > > What about the existing code, do you want to: > - refactor the code, removing prefixes and creating a checkstyle setting > which forbid them > - leave the code as is for now and keep the current checkstyle > configuration (doesn't force you to put prefixes nor to remove them) > > And about the release, I think we can release a first beta version as > soon as we have the documentation complete. How to name it? > - Displaytag 0.9b1? > - Displaytag 1.0b1? > - ? > > please cast your votes :) > > another thing: I think we could remove the old display09 module from cvs > now, any admin could take care of this? > > fabrizio > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > displaytag-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel > -- John York Software Engineer CareerSite Corporation ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ displaytag-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel
