+1 on removing them. The sooner the better ;-) +1 on Displaytag 1.0b1 - name the jar displaytag-1.0-b1.jar
Display09: yep, remove it, just use CVS remove (empty module) or add support request at SF. Make sure you make a backup. Cheers, Mathias -----Original Message----- From: Fabrizio Giustina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 2 september 2003 22:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [displaytag-devel] goin on Ok, prefixes in code convention are gone, I think no one likes them. What about the existing code, do you want to: - refactor the code, removing prefixes and creating a checkstyle setting which forbid them - leave the code as is for now and keep the current checkstyle configuration (doesn't force you to put prefixes nor to remove them) And about the release, I think we can release a first beta version as soon as we have the documentation complete. How to name it? - Displaytag 0.9b1? - Displaytag 1.0b1? - ? please cast your votes :) another thing: I think we could remove the old display09 module from cvs now, any admin could take care of this? fabrizio ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ displaytag-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ displaytag-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel
