Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jul 10, 2003, "Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yeah. I vote always do it, too. > > Fine, I'll do that. As long as there's a way to disable it, I'm fine > with it. I dislike that it will prevent legitimate uses of ccache and > make gcc different from all other compilers in this regard, but, heck, > I don't want to fight over this.
I don't understand. On by default makes sense precisely because there's no bad side effect to this feature. If there *is* a bad side effect which I'm not aware of, then my opinion may be different, but I don't see how having this information in the .i file can possibly interfere with anything. zw __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
