On Aug 3, 2003, Neil Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No response, so I assume -Pwd is a reasonable option. Here's a >> patch, bootstrapped on i686-pc-linux-gnu. Ok to install?
> There has been no agreement on this patch. Which is why I have only posted it, instead of just checking it in. > If there were, it would need to be -fpwd. This is stupid. -fpwd would be an option for the compiler. I'm talking about an option for the preprocessor. -P is the option that tells the preprocessor to not emit line markers. -Pwd is an obvious extension to make it not emit the preprocessing working directory. I don't see why -fpwd would be any better. Anyway, if you still have any issues other than the spelling of the option, please let me know. Since I asked whether you still had any issues before and you didn't bring up any, I could only assume that you didn't. If you could please be a bit respectful of the time I'm spending on this, please let me know of any other issues you still have with the patch, so that I can address them all in the next round. Thanks, -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
