On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:51:38PM -0700, Daniel Kegel wrote: > Martin Pool wrote: > >Thank you for the patch. It looks OK to me, except that I am not sure > >if it should be an option specified in that way. I wonder if it > >should always be on? Or at least, if it should always be on until we > >have some kind of automatic weighting of faster machines. > > People are used to the first machine being hit first, aren't they? > We figured making it optional would be less disruption. > Whatever you think is best is ok with us.
How about keeping the first machine still being hit first but then randomize the remaining hosts? Tim.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
