On 24 Jun 2004, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess you'd need to add an OUFN to the request to give the > name of each output file, then. And the DOTO would be replaced > with just a generic OFIL token, I suppose.
Yes, and similarly coming back. I just didn't write that bit yet. Does that sound OK? > BTW we'll have to change the server to use the proper .i name, > presumably in a randomly-named directory, otherwise the .da files > are generated with the wrong name. Yes, one thing I wanted to do was to allow the client to control the input and output filenames, which implies a clean directory for each job. I think this will make it easier to support tasks other than gcc: either different compilers or something other than C compilation. > (And I have to patch gcc anyway to set the directory name used for > the .da files. Maybe I could get away with combining the two, but I > don't think so.) Could you explain more about this? -- Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc