Hi Martin, > Using the separate preprocessor for localhost may be a substantial > loss, because gcc won't be able to use the integrated preprocessor. > It might be worth trying though -- it should be an easy change.
If you say so ;) I would happily benchmark any patch you'd send to me. > No, the preprocessor completes before any data is sent. Is this on purpose, because doing otherwise isn't possible? Looks quite clear to me that feeding the distant host with preprocessed data as we generate it, rather than afterwards, would represent a substantial gain. Again, I wouldn't know how to change the code to do this, if only this is possible at all, but would benchmark any test patch you would come up with. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
