I'm working on the following enhancements to distcc,
all motivated by observing shortcomings in real use
in a demanding environment:

1. gcc-2.95.3 sometimes spins on invalid input.  The user eventually
   aborts the build, but distccd does not then kill the compile job.
   Distccd should kill the compile job on timeout (say, 20 minutes)
   or if the client disconnects.

2. Hung servers make users very, very unhappy,
   and unfortunately, distcc servers tend to hang (or appear to hang)
   much more often than one would like, but not often enough to
   be easy to debug.
   To insulate users from hung servers, there should be
   a simple way to prequalify distcc servers before a build
   run.  I am extending the lsdistcc program I posted
   earlier to actually run a trivial compilation on each
   server; it will only list servers which complete the trivial
   compilation by a deadline (say, 1 second).
   (And, of course, lsdistcc lets you autodiscover
   distcc servers listed in DNS, which makes deploying at
   large sites much easier.)

3. There is no ready-made way to monitor a distcc cluster's health.
   There should be a simple way to measure compile latency
   of all machines in a cluster, and an example crontab script
   showing how to use it to trigger email alerts if a machine goes bad.
   Likewise, distccd should keep statistics of its own health and activity,
   and make them available via HTTP for easy remote access.

4. When a distccd server is full up on active jobs, and other nearby
   servers are not, it's a shame that clients which connect to the
   wrong server have to wait.   Perhaps the server should actively
   turn away compile requests, so the client could do a local compilation
   or try another server.  Or perhaps a (set of redundant) load balancers
   would be appropriate.

5. If Alice has already compiled everything on client A, and Bob starts a job
   to compile the same everything on client B, it's a shame that Bob has to 
wait;
   perhaps distccd (or a load balancer!) should (carefully) cache results.

6. distccd is a known insecure service.  Even with the IP address access 
control list,
   Bad Guys could potentially use it to subvert a network.  A tighter access
   control scheme might be appropriate for some sites, e.g. using kerberos
   to restrict access to just the people allowed to submit code to the revision
   control system (who can subvert everything anyhow).

I have preliminary code for the first three, haven't started on the
load-balancing cache yet, and only have a little demo code for
kerberos access control.
I'm being helped on and off by a number of folks, including Thomas
Kho, Jeff Evarts, and Dongmin Zhang.

If I do decide to do a load-balancing cache, I'll probably
start by writing nonblocking versions of the dcc_* networking functions.
Ideally I'd end up with a library that would let you plug
in caching on the client, in the proxy, or on the server.

Just thought I'd post to see if anyone else was using distcc heavily
and was interested in testing any of the above (or even helping code it).
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Reply via email to