Ben Finney wrote: > > Yes, that's mainly my point. Whether a particular set of bits is > “architecture-dependent” or “architecture-independent” is rather > orthogonal, in Python, to whether it's an executable program library. >
I don't think I have ever used the term executable program library in that discussion, so I don't understand your point. Architecture independent is the wording used by FHS, not mine (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLIBLIBRARIESFORPROGRAMMINGANDPA), which is why I used it in http://wiki.python.org/moin/Distutils/Proposals/AutoconfLikeOptions. David _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
