2009/6/4 P.J. Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> > At 11:17 AM 6/4/2009 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > >> - new PEP 386 | waiting for your feedback >> >> - http://svn.python.org/projects/peps/trunk/pep-0386.txt >> > > > From the PEP: > >> Last ".dev456post623" is a development version of a post-release >> > > This appears incorrect to me; it should be a post-release of a development > version, analagous to ".dev456-r623" in a setuptools version. >
In the Pycon discussions the ".devNNN" was meant to *be* the "rNNN" part. A commonly expected value for NNN would be the source code control revision number. At least that was my understanding. Do you know of examples using a ".dev456-r623"-type scheme? Trent -- Trent Mick tre...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
