On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:05 AM, David Cournapeau <da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote: [..] > > Exactly. The fact that we in numpy consider distutils backward > compatibility not worth the cost, even though we are most likely the > most tied up with distutils, is quite telling about the state of affairs > IMHO.
That doesn't prove Distutils can't evolve. That just shows that numpy worked on its side. If the Numpy projects made some refactoring/improvement, why the project didn't try to push it back in Distutils itself ? _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
