On 28 March 2013 13:11, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > I don't know if it's that important to distinguish between the two. I found > the approach I'm using with distil to be a tad more flexible in my case. A > runnable zip has the advantage that it's harder to tinker with, but with the > way distil.py is at the moment, you can tweak e.g. its logging just by > changing distil.py. (At some point soon it will have an optional > configuration file to control some aspects of its behaviour, but that's by > the by.) It also does a bit of processing to process -e and -p and relaunches > with a new Python interpreter if needed - developing this logic was quicker > because I didn't have to add my changes to the .zip each time I tweaked > something.
Good point. Paul _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
