On Jan 15, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Vinay Sajip <[email protected]> wrote:
>> fair question. partly due to personal comfort level with git/github, but >> also was >> hoping we'd get more involvement using github, since it's more popular. > > Your choice, of course, and I understand about the personal preference part. > I do > wonder how much involvement you will get from people who would be put off > getting involved by the fact that a project is on BitBucket (which fully > supports Git > as well as Mercurial). There's so little difference in functionality between > the two > sites that I can't see any barrier to a real contributor (real = someone > willing to > spend a reasonable amount of time on a project, larger than the time required > to learn a new but similar site). I suppose time will tell :-) > > Regards, > > Vinay Sajip > Not that I won’t contribute to something on bitbucket, but it factors into my decision and I’m less likely to contribute to something on bitbucket, and even more less likely to contribute to something self hosted or on another host. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
