On 15 May 2014 21:20, "Donald Stufft" <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > > > On May 15, 2014, at 4:16 AM, Daniele Sluijters < daniele.sluijt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Has anyone considered what this will mean for people on distributions > > that ship older pip versions that can't be upgraded outside of the > > release cycle (like Debian and Redhat)? > > > > So a nice property of this, is that degrades gracefully. The things we need in > the installer to actually make the core functionality (specifying additional > locations) work has existed for a very long time. The piece of the > functionality that they'd be missing is the UX around discovering the > additional index. We could/should probably also indicate this location on the > PyPI project page so that would help with this some.
I was more thinking of automated use cases that are currently working, but would need to switch command line options or config settings for the change described in the PEP. We'll want to take that into account when deciding how long to make the server half of the deprecation period for existing externally hosted projects. Cheers, Nick. > > ----------------- > Donald Stufft > PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA > > > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig >
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
