On November 10, 2015 at 1:58:38 AM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 10 November 2015 at 16:14, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 30 October 2015 at 16:27, Marcus Smith wrote: > >>> > >>> ================================= > >>> Whenever a new PEP is put forward on distutils-sig, any PyPA core > >>> reviewer that believes they are suitably experienced to make the final > >>> decision on that PEP may offer to serve as the BDFL's delegate (or > >>> "PEP czar") for that PEP. If their self-nomination is accepted by the > >>> other PyPA core reviewer, the lead PyPI maintainer and the lead > >>> CPython representative on distutils-sig, then they will have the > >>> authority to approve (or reject) that PEP. > >>> ================================= > >> > >> > >> Nick: > >> just be clear, if nobody nominates themselves, then you still remain (by > >> default) the active delegate who's responsible for ruling on a Pypa-related > >> PEP? > > > > For anything PyPI related, it defaults to being Donald's call as lead > > maintainer, for other interoperability specs, it defaults to me. > > Although I'll also note that whenever Donald wants to handle an > interoperability PEP himself (as with the dependency specifier one), > I'm highly unlikely to object :) >
And of course, it’s likely that a lot of PyPI PEPs will end up having someone other than myself as the BDFL-Delegate since it’s likely a fair number of them will be written by me heh. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig