-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/20/2016 04:36 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote:
> its not given lightly, and it shouldn't be easy to weasel out of it. > Actually a noop release is a good indicator that the mark is > well-deserved and should be keept. Making an effort to remove a mark > without making the reason for its existence go as well is a lie in > plain sight. A release, any release, is a sign that the maintainer is around and cares about the package enough to act. That should be sufficient to block any takeover attempt. > this reminds me of the whole setuptools/distribute situation. I don't think that means what you think it does: the situation was resolved amicably, via negotiation with the owner of the original name. The fact that it took longer than some wanted was *not* an indication that it was the wrong outcome. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXGAaCAAoJEPKpaDSJE9HY3FIQAL87jOyqytF1MuC5SHqiw0y1 p7BYWrLf8MVl+DFRJ0x0s9NPVgvkeF+rbx17WD7k8Eik5iuXzTpjIun0oI9UBkwC iTpogEwDrFg3T/s3bM0ObAphcLFHAY4YFMXsUThODtCHg4qi/04Z9RiMhnabwitP GfzuI33aDZbgkyi3ozEse5rP1xTn3SmhtHwu7k5gQvAmg8ntpXFzP7l1IXNWtPr+ SGXzsgohZwsDdOBwOibbvQ3VQSmeLBPrfsP0xVzNOIh7GEHT6AXMM8qK52Er4vMd SQmR2r0WAShqDm+LadfK/KjrvwSgQILpp1z4jvY6k3PWhtLABEeotDZj5mgRY8Hf 0+NTBuifYo7SHs+ElI4nryDbp48q2DZH2PLdh3WgyMlLzTocXTjQcwOTEZGcbb7t s5u+/cQLzfvg4Z23i7wPGrUrBZvl4YM3YKZfsC3Pl5v9jfwiJm/ay7G7O2NHstdB inI23H427ELXgPLI8Ffi9u7MQ6zTCd0H/XNxaiWAhG4JmMZyFuNqJQAuZ9+cR9N+ WWPEpfpHhWW9pYdxKWPHJLWKoGTu+6qPqIMnCPn3sY8ACnqH7z5puNu+/uAJ3hBt PNVh+wKE4R1wNXHKHaHqVqMH/Ut057hEh3EIOwX5e8W/zCojZy8O6PjmaFW7EGdd BMtyIkp2jgQJMY3ClfP6 =w60N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
