On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 26 Jun 2016 23:37, "Pradyun Gedam" <pradyu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hello List! >> > >> > I feel it’s fine to hold back the other changes for later but the >> > upgrade-strategy change should get shipped out to the world as quickly >> as >> > possible. Even how the change is exposed the user can also be discussed >> later. >> > >> > I request the list members to focus on only the change of the default >> > upgrade strategy to be non-eager. >> > >> > Does anyone have any concerns regarding the change of the default >> upgrade >> > strategy to be non-eager? If not, let’s get just that shipped out as >> soon as possible. >> >> Pairing that change with an explicit "pip upgrade-all" command would get >> a +1 from me, especially if there was a printed warning when the new >> upgrade strategy skips packages the old one would have updated. >> > Please do not mix upgrade with upgrade-all. The latter is blocked by lack > of a SAT solver for a long time, and at the current pace that status may > not change for another couple of years. Also mixing these up is > unnecessary, and it was discussed last year on this list already to move > ahead with upgrade: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel/24219 > And, on request of Robert all discussion was moved to https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/3786, so we probably should not continue this thread. Ralf
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
