On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 at 03:56 Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 20 July 2017 at 10:46, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> To make this concrete: I'm *pretty* sure (?) that at this point all > >> the basic elements in my "simplified" rewrite are things that we now > >> have consensus are needed in some form, so maybe we can use that as a > >> kind of "minimal core" reference point: > >> > >> > https://github.com/njsmith/peps/commits/517-refactor-streamline/pep-0517.txt > > > > I don't have time this week to look at this, sorry, but a couple of > points: > > > > 1) This links to a commit in your repo, not to the actual document. > > Ugh, sorry! Pasted the wrong link. This is the correct one: > > > https://github.com/njsmith/peps/blob/517-refactor-streamline/pep-0517.txt > > > Also, I'd *really* prefer a rendered version if I'm going to review > > this. > > Annoyingly, the PEPs repo uses a .txt extension for .rst files, thus > cleverly preventing github from doing anything useful by default... >
We will happily accept help in converting plaintext PEPs into reST ones so we can universally change the file extensions to .rst (see https://github.com/python/peps/issues/1) :) -Brett
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
