While I'm not quite sure why these locations couldn't be surveyed instead of being imported from a third party with completely unclear quality, the more important question is, given the potentially sensitive nature of the information, have the entities in question been asked if they are OK with the integration in OSM (which from a visibility POV is very different from being registered in an obscure government database)?
Simon Am 09.03.2019 um 19:21 schrieb Rory McCann: > Might be interesting to some here > > On 07.03.19 21:32, Lanxana . wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'd like to get feedback on my plan for import the information and >> care points for women and LGTBI collectives in Catalunya, Spain. This >> importation will be an act to celebrate 8M 2019 and the second >> aniverary of GeoChicas. >> The import had been discussed on talk-es list and you can see the >> import plan here: >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_information_and_care_points_for_women_and_LGTBI_collectives_in_Catalunya >> >> >> If there are no objections, the import would start from March 15. >> >> Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > Diversity-talk mailing list > Code of Conduct: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Diversity/MailingList/CodeOfConduct > Contact the mods (private): diversity-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Diversity-talk mailing list Code of Conduct: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Diversity/MailingList/CodeOfConduct Contact the mods (private): diversity-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
