John Merrells wrote:
Here's an update to the use cases draft that incorporates the
comments on the list over the past week.
John
John,
these are great, I have a question on scope of the use cases though. I
notice that in the non browser use cases there are some non http use
cases e.g. SIMPLE, IMAP. I was under the impression, probably from
dmd0, that we were just looking at having a binding of DIX into http
initially, so......
Is it the intention of the use cases to cover all protocols or just
http? If it is all protocols then I think the non-browser use cases
need considerable expansion.
Rob
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
