On 18-Apr-06, at 5:12 AM, Robert Yates wrote:
I notice that in the non browser use cases there are some non http
use cases e.g. SIMPLE, IMAP. I was under the impression, probably
from dmd0, that we were just looking at having a binding of DIX
into http initially, so...... Is it the intention of the use cases
to cover all protocols or just http? If it is all protocols then I
think the non-browser use cases need considerable expansion.
The charter as currently drafted roughly says 'http binding now,
other bindings later, if people want them.' So, I collated the use
cases from the list with that remit. I think that the browser use
cases are complete enough that other documents could be written
against them. But the non-browser cases clearly aren't detailed
enough for that. dmd0/dmd1 attempts to address just the browser
cases. dmuc2 can be developed further if people want to do that and
should be taken further if people want to write further documents
against them.
What do you folks on the list want to do with dmuc2?
Does it document the goals and motivations of the group?
Does it do so well enough to move forward with finding solutions that
solve those problems?
John
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
