On 4-Jun-06, at 8:43 PM, Jeff Hodges wrote:
Furthermore, the notion of SAML assertions as a means of concisely
conveying
Subject information is not directly employed.
I'm currently looking into how we can reuse Subject and Subject
Confirmation to carry our Persona URL and to signal that it should be
verified using the lighter weight signing mechanism.
SAML assertions are nominally
profiled in draft-merrells-dix-assertion-00, but, for example,
'nominally'? Meaning not enough?
are not actually employed in draft-merrells-dix-02.
Intentionally, the assertions are an example of a claim format that
could be used for moving around third party attested attribute value
assertions.
John
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
