On 1/25/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, it would set a good precedent for the type of issue that > would generate a point release (i.e., anything causing unexpected data > loss). I'll leave the final decision in the RM's hands, but I > certainly wouldn't object.
I haven't yet had a chance to look at the patch in detail, but regardless of the eventual outcome I'll need to produce a version which applies cleanly to stock 0.95.1 (probably not too much trouble, since generic relations haven't changed a whole lot over the lifetime of the 0.95 releases) for the bugfixes branch. At the moment I'm leaning toward rolling 0.95.2 immediately after that goes in, but I'd like to hear opinions on it; with 0.96 probably coming up soon, I can come up with good arguments either way. -- "Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically correct -- the best kind of correct." --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
