On Nov 30, 6:33 am, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we ought to call the release 2.0.
I'm -0.5 on this (if that's possible). I understand the thinking behind it, but "1.0" isn't an arbitrary version number - it has a very specific meaning: "the APIs are frozen, it's safe to build things without worrying that backwards compatibility will be broken". That's what we've been telling people for the past couple of years, and as a result I feel it would be odd to use 2.0 to make the statement that version numbers are meaningless after all. I think that the release of v1.0 combined with the publication of the Django Book will result in a serious uptick in interest in the project (and that's not saying that there isn't plenty of interest already). I wouldn't want to see some of that interest diverted by confusion over version numbers. Cheers, Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
