On 8 Dec 2007, at 20:14, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Shifting to a more personal stance, I never cared much for the term > "Web 2.0". It seems too gimmicky. That's largely the impression I > get with a Django 2.0 without a prior Django 1.0. The other problem with Django 2.0 is that Rails just released their 2.0 - which means that a Django release will look like an attempt to catch up on the version number - obviously not the case. If we wanted to make a statement about Django's maturity that statement could be equally well served by jumping straight to 1.5. This would also maintain the meaningfulness of version 1.0 - once past 1.0, backwards compatibility with the APIs is guaranteed. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
