-100

Non-English post isn't noise!

Some English posts has more less profit then non-English ones.

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Arien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The non-English posts are clearly useful to the Django community as a
> > whole, as it appears that the majority of its members don't speak
> > English as their native tongue.
>
> I'm totally fine with non-English feeds being available.
>
>
> >> Having *only* a [language-agnostic] firehose feed, as we do now, is a
> problem.
> >
> > Why?
>
> Because, as I've mentioned earlier: users effectively get noise in
> their feeds.  For any post in a language other than English, *the vast
> majority* of the Django community won't be able to read it.  I'm not
> only talking about native English speakers here; why should we expect
> that a native Portuguese speaker will be able to read a Russian post?
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to