-100 Non-English post isn't noise!
Some English posts has more less profit then non-English ones. On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Arien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The non-English posts are clearly useful to the Django community as a > > whole, as it appears that the majority of its members don't speak > > English as their native tongue. > > I'm totally fine with non-English feeds being available. > > > >> Having *only* a [language-agnostic] firehose feed, as we do now, is a > problem. > > > > Why? > > Because, as I've mentioned earlier: users effectively get noise in > their feeds. For any post in a language other than English, *the vast > majority* of the Django community won't be able to read it. I'm not > only talking about native English speakers here; why should we expect > that a native Portuguese speaker will be able to read a Russian post? > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---