Waylan, while discussing this with Clint, I came to the conclusion
that we will still face this problem with this solution.  However,
IMO, that is indicative of an upstream problem and should be reported
up stream, once it is fixed there this solution will continue to work
correctly for both regular modules and eggs.

Alex

On Oct 23, 12:20 am, "Waylan Limberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Clint Ecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >   I've opened a ticket on this matter (http://code.djangoproject.com/
> > ticket/9427) but the gist of it is this:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I'm throwing this out there just to get a wider eye on the patch just
> > in case there are any edge cases that these changes might affect.
>
> What about an admin.py in an egg that legitimately raises an error on
> import? If imp.find_module can't find it as you claim, won't that
> error be eaten? Now, I realize that should probably be caught while
> testing not in an egg first, but it is a real possibility. Perhaps we
> shouldn't care about that one though.
>
> --
> ----
> Waylan Limberg
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to