Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Johannes Dollinger
> [...]
>> * I always felt the API for custom tags is too verbose.
>>
>
> There's almost universal agreement on this point :)
>
> It's unfortunately pretty tricky to do in a backwards-compatible way:
> we've sorta pasted ourselves into a corner here by letting tags do
> anything they want in terms of parsing. This lead to an inconsistency
> in syntax that we (unfortunately) have to continue to support.
>
> However, that's no reason not to have a better API on top that
> third-party tags can use -- as long as internal tags don't break.
>
Heretical suggestion: {: :}, {! !}, {$ $} or {[ ]} with a different
processor (falling back to the original if necessary), and therefore no
need for a fully backwards-compatible approach?
regards
Steve
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
