Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Johannes Dollinger > [...] >> * I always felt the API for custom tags is too verbose. >> > > There's almost universal agreement on this point :) > > It's unfortunately pretty tricky to do in a backwards-compatible way: > we've sorta pasted ourselves into a corner here by letting tags do > anything they want in terms of parsing. This lead to an inconsistency > in syntax that we (unfortunately) have to continue to support. > > However, that's no reason not to have a better API on top that > third-party tags can use -- as long as internal tags don't break. > Heretical suggestion: {: :}, {! !}, {$ $} or {[ ]} with a different processor (falling back to the original if necessary), and therefore no need for a fully backwards-compatible approach?
regards Steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---