I've made a few more changes, added many more tests and written documentation. This now fixes #6188, #6304, #6618, #6969, #8758, #8989, #10334, #11069 and #11973.
Any final feedback would be appreciated. I'll put it together as a patch and put it in a ticket as soon as possible. Thanks, Ben On 28 Nov 2009, at 15:43, Ben Firshman wrote: > Hi all, > > I originally had great plans for refactoring the syndication contrib > app, but a lack of time and the thorny issue of backwards > compatibility has forced me to stick to the one big feature: making > feeds class-based views. > > http://github.com/bfirsh/syndication-view/ > > The readme should be self explanatory. In short, instances of Feed > subclasses (now in syndication.views rather syndication.feeds) can > be used as views. The feed API is almost identical, except that > get_object(), much like a view, takes the request and the URL > arguments. > > More comprehensive tests and a modification of Django's > documentation is on its way. > > This currently fixes tickets #6188, #6304, #6969, #8758, #8989 and > #11069. I plan to fix the trivial tickets #6618, #7039, #7936, > #10334, #11939 and #11973 before it's ready for committing. > > Ben > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Django developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
