On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alex's comment on ticket #18013 reminded me of this. Is there any > reason not to get rid of the Django's version of simplejson now that > Python 2.6 always has the json module? > > I see three options here: > > 1) Remove Django's copy and only leave the simplejson/json fallback. > 2) Above, plus deprecate "django.utils.simplejson" in 1.5 and remove it 1.6 > 3) Replace the code with anyjson, so it does something useful: > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/anyjson > > What do you think ? > > -- > Łukasz Rekucki > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. > > I'd favor number two. Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
