Submitted patch:

https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21105#comment:1

On Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:09:55 PM UTC+3, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 15, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Florian Apolloner 
> <f.apo...@gmail.com<javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ram,
>
> On Sunday, September 15, 2013 12:34:03 PM UTC+2, Ram Rachum wrote:
>>
>> Florian, I'm not sure that you read my message carefully enough. I'm *not 
>> *proposing to reduce the time that PBKDF2  takes to hash.
>>
>
> By replacing the password with a hash before running it through PBKDF2 you 
> are reducing that time for every password longer than the hash… And given 
> the way PBKDF2 works you'll reduce it by quite a bit (note that all of this 
> only applies to passwords longer than the hash, so it's probably pretty 
> academical). Either way, we'd at least need a new hasher class since it 
> would be backwards incompatible. Independent of that we'd have to evaluate 
> if pre-hashing the password could make  PBKDF2 less secure (probably not to 
> likely, but who knows).
>
>
> According to Thomas Porin in the context of bcrypt pre-hashing the 
> password is fine (and we already do this in Django 1.6). I see no reason 
> the same wouldn't hold true for PBKDF2.
>
> -----------------
> Donald Stufft
> PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 
> DCFA 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to