2014-02-11 13:42 GMT+01:00 Christopher Medrela <chris.medr...@gmail.com>:
> What did Armin said about Python 3 exactly? > He wrote an extensive argumentation about "why Python 2 [is] the better language for dealing with text and bytes" [1] as well as a number of tweets and a few other blog posts along the same lines. While his arguments are technically correct, I disagree with his conclusions because he's speaking with the point of view of an expert maintaining libraries at the boundary between unicode and bytes (like werkzeug). However, most Python users aren't experts and aren't maintaining such libraries. In my experience working with Python programmers ranging from intern to veteran, the unicode model of Python 3 is a strict improvement over Python 2 in terms of pitfalls hit in day-to-day programming. YMMV. [1] http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2014/1/5/unicode-in-2-and-3/ -- Aymeric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CANE-7mU31zMRkVrJAZY_tde-xdiU63p2s38pB2vVPpeDpPBkxQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
