On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Meira <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to be, there are enough reasonable people leaving comments like > this one: https://github.com/django/django/pull/2720#issuecomment-44296843 >
We'll just get the databases to change their terminology before we change ours! Of course, the DB folks will get reasonable comments saying they should wait until the tools that integrate with the DBs change *their* documentation... And thus we have an example of a mutually-recursive function. *Somebody* has to move first, and actually move rather than say "I'll move when those other people do". We decided to go ahead and move on this one. For the record I am strongly against reverting at this point -- and I'm saying that as someone whose initial reaction to the pull request was "oh, a troll" until I looked more into who had submitted it. With well-written documentation, any confusion that's produced should be slight and momentary, and I'm OK with that as the tradeoff of using less-charged language. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAL13Cg9i%2Bt3P1AnT6Q7NDX%2BPHjP6jTnhRDHy5BcdF9gcDkUf%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
