I don't think it's fair to put pressure on Aymeric like that. It seems to me with should, if anything, be more conservative with an LTS -- not try to cram in last minute features. We have 2-3 months until the scheduled final release -- if we liberalize our "rules", I'm sure we can kick that date out the window. My own hope (from what others have expressed interest in) is to move Django to a more rapid release cycle of 6-9 months instead of the more historical 9-12 months. I believe this feature will be all the better in 1.9 after getting a first version out the door in 1.8.
On Sunday, January 4, 2015 3:51:22 AM UTC-5, Florian Apolloner wrote: > > On Sunday, January 4, 2015 2:44:52 AM UTC+1, jdunck wrote: >> >> If getting proper support for other template backends would only delay >> the 1.8 release timeline by a couple weeks, I think that is preferable to a >> generalized 1.8 backend which only include DTL until 1.9. >> > > Define proper support. Either way -1 on pushing the alpha further. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/3e10a35f-16cf-46c1-a832-7c9a17ac5a80%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
