On 16 July 2015 at 05:01, Shai Berger <s...@platonix.com> wrote: > This is a shot in the dark: Could it be that rolling back transactions > involving unlogged tables is harder? The idea does make sense, and running the > test suite does an extremely untypical amount of rollbacks.
I thought at some point I read that unlogged tables didn't support transactions... however, the docs don't agree. I was also considering going to the PG people and asking if the UNLOGGED docs needed review... there could be all manner of reasons why, on modern hardware, going via the WAL is as fast now... -- C -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAG_XiSCcZ%3Df-919dSdOif0ZVMT6fma5yE3xy20%2Bw7E04y2E3kQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
