On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 11:48:24 PM UTC-5, Doug Epling wrote: > > Hey Tim -- > > Basically, we need data. My recommendation involves two separate > initiatives. > > First is, has been, a discussion open for spectators but limited > participants to core members. Asside from its subject pertaining current > state and future path, all other details are above my pay grade. >
Actually, whatever on that first point. But on this second point it entirely not necessary. Django has all the feedback in textual form that it would ever need for some user analysis. I did not realize the extent of the IRC logs. This body of text is a treasure chest. And Django should be mining it for all it is worth. > Second is, has been, the active solicitation of a standardized body of > feedback from the peripheral users of Django documentation in a fairly > substantial amount. We might want to start a new discussion thread on this > particular topic. > > Many thanks for your hard work and dedication. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/facc1359-7ec6-4683-b5f4-eeeabbc29e20%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
