Den 17. aug. 2018 22:07, skrev James Bennett: > > If you're basing your understanding on browser support, you're not > doing XML/XHTML. You're doing "a thing that looks like XHTML and works > in my browser".
Webstandards has and probably always will be defined by browser support. That's how the web works. I am sure you know it. XHTML5 is a XML materialization of HTML5, and there is also the SGML-inspired version. It is possible have valid xml markup without a schema, and it is possible to make a schema more or less tolerant. The reason there is no official schema for the XML version is the same as the reason there is no official SGML DTD. Browser support is a moving target. Any official schema also need to take custom elements into consideration. So a schema can be strict about all the wrapping tags and header tags, but it need to be more "free-form" when it comes to what kind of tags can be inside the body. It not not only work in "my browser" it work for every major browser out there. Which is the "de facto" definition of when browser technology can be used. Regards -- Nils Fredrik Gjerull ----------------------------- "Ministry of Eternal Affairs" Computer Department ( Not an official title :) ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/7ee1f4b0-42ed-40ac-c0d2-a63df5f6a62b%40gjerull.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
