> I usually agree with new features being opt-in, but perhaps this case is 
> different?
>
> If I had tests that are breaking if executed randomly, I’d want to know 
> about it yesterday. IOW, I’m having difficulty imagining a scenario where 
> the user would be thankful for not activating this feature by default. So 
> personally, I’d like to see an opt-out setting for this in settings.py.
>
> /$0.02 
> Fran
>

`--reverse`  will catch 95% of test isolation issues for you. It's highly 
more likely that running tests in reverse order will catch isolation issue 
for you than running them in a non-deterministic order. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/20b685d8-7a8e-4a87-a307-70146426948dn%40googlegroups.com.
  • req... Chris Jerdonek
    • ... 'Adam Johnson' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
      • ... Mariusz Felisiak
        • ... Fran Hrženjak
          • ... Mariusz Felisiak
            • ... chris.j...@gmail.com
              • ... Florian Apolloner
                • ... Florian Apolloner
                • ... Chris Jerdonek
                • ... Florian Apolloner
                • ... 'Adam Johnson' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)

Reply via email to