On 7/8/06, Iain Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I checked them out on a friends reco, but got the impressions that > reliable uptime for a business was not really their priority, so I don't > feel like I could in good faith put a clients site up there that is just > supposed to keep working. Correct me if I'm wrong?
I've been a very happy shared hosting customer for about eighteen months; they went through a period of growing pains where their shared hosting base increased by a huge amount and a lot of their users found new and interesting ways to eat up server resources, but things have been very smooth for quite some time now. Through it all I've never once gotten the impression that "reliable uptime was not a priority"; if anything, most of the complaints I've heard in the past few months are that TextDrive came to be a little too zealous in their automated enforcement of things like resource-utilization limits (which were relaxed a tiny bit just the other day in response). They do also offer business-level accounts with SLA-style guarantees on uptime, though, and common sense would recommend going that route if it's what you really need.. I've always marveled at the number of people out there who claim to have "mission-critical" sites but are unwilling to pay more than the base $12/mo. shared plan to host them... -- "May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house." -- George Carlin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
