Hi, I have dedicated server sites and django hosting sites. Personally, I prefer that someone else takes care of the server and focus myself on development. So, unless you need to use a lot of resources for some reason, dedicated django hostings are ok to me.
About google apps, I never used it. Regards, Francesc On Aug 5, 1:48 pm, Herman Schistad <herman.schis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. > > I'm developing a site with approx. 500 visits per day, mainly from > Norway (Europe). > > Now I'm trying to find the best possible way to host this site. > Earlier I've used dedicated hosts like WebFaction and Djangoeurope, > and this has worked pretty well. > However Google AppEnginge is free and provides a really reliable > server (as far as I can tell). But I'm no expert on this matter and > therefore come to you guys. > > What is the tradeoff between using Google AppEngine (with > django-nonrel [1]), learning this, and writing my application for the > Google datastore versus using a traditional host. > Are there any big challanges by using AppEngine? > > A third alternative would to maybe invest in e.g. dedicated virtual > machine at MediaTemple[2] or something. > > So what it all boils down to: which is your preffered hosting method, > and why/why not? > - Google AppEngine > - Dedicated django hosting (e.g. WebFaction[3]) > - Virtual server/dedicated server (e.g. MediaTemple) > > tl;dr: pros/cons with Google AppEngine, and which hosting method is > your preferred method? > > [1]:http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/django.html > [2]:http://mediatemple.net/webhosting/dv/ > [3]:http://www.webfaction.com/ > > -- > With regards, Herman Schistad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
