On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Vincent <langenschei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9 fév, 12:25, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote: > > By using a separate system they ensure there application is portable > > to different hosting mechanisms, which will be good protection given > > that mod_python is dying a slow death and is unlikely to be ported to > > Python 3.0. > > So I was correct that Django/Turbogears/etc. don't rely on mod_python? > > Good to know that mod_python is losing momentum. > > > Django doesn't require mod_python specifically, but it does need some webserver and a way to interact with it, so you are welcome to use mod_wsgi, or fastcgi or whatever else you can hook up, but you need something. Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." --Voltaire "The people's good is the highest law."--Cicero --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
