On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 11:47 +0300, Jani Tiainen wrote: > HB kirjoitti: > > Hey, > > Why Django doesn't provide integration with Ajax out of the box (like > > Rails and Wicket)? > > It all depends what you mean by "integration"? > > You can use (model)forms with Ajax, or use any other means if you wish. > > Only thing that django doesn't provide is Ajax form rendering - I mean > that you can't just say {{ form }} and magically get ajaxafied form.
I'll reply here, rather than against the original post, since you're hit the nail on the head, but I want to expand somewhat... We have always encouraged people to come up with a good set of template tags to do this sort of stuff. Right now, there doesn't appear to be anything that looks very Django-like. If you look at the Ajax helpers in Rails, for example, it's like writing Ruby in the templates. Since Django deliberately strives to have very simple templates, without programming in the templates, the challenge is greater for "generic" template tags. This doesn't mean it's harder to use Ajax, it just means that people are more likely to write custom template tags that insert the precise Ajax bits they're after. Including Ajax or other Javascript bits in Django templates isn't hard and writing custom tags is very easy, so it seems that the middle ground we've arrived at is reasonably acceptable to our core audience (experienced Python developers and web designers). It also doesn't mean that people shouldn't continue to try and create the perfect set of Ajax tags. When that happens, it will attract attention, fame, fortune, etc, and after suitable shaking out, we would look at whether it's worthwhile including in contrib. But in the 4+ years that Django has been open sourced, nobody has yet done that, which shows where the balance between need and pragmatism lies. > And there is good reason - what would be javascript framework to use > then? MooTools? jQuery? Prototype? ExtJS? Or my favourite Dojotoolkit (I > bet there is dozen of others that I don't remember or are aware of) That is also definitely a consideration. Along those lines, there are some library specific helpers that have been created. Search for dojango, for example, a set of Dojo-based Django template tags. I'm not sure if they're particularly good or not, as I haven't used them much at all, but they exist, which is definitely a good thing. There's also YUI-based incremental loading via Django template tags out there, too, which was even featured on the YUI developers blog (as an example of YUI-in-action) at one point. Regards, Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---