Hi Nicolas. This is a FAQ, actually.
In short - mailing lists software need to be updated for not failing the DKIM. Some on this list will argue that "update" is a wrong word, though. Am 24.08.2014 14:27 schrieb "Nicolás via dmarc-discuss" < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>: > Hi! > > I'm new to DMARC, I configured it just a bunch of days ago, and even that > I think it's a great idea, I'm worried about its limitations over mailing > lists. I've read the FAQ <http://www.dmarc.org/faq.html#r_2> about this, > and I'm not quite clear about what can I do to avoid DMARC checkings to > fail. > > I'm subscribed to about 10 lists, none of them rewrites the 'MAIL FROM' > header so the original sender address is being sent (in my case > nico...@devels.es), which implies that DMARC will be tested against my > domain. Last night a report arrived with lots of records with SPF/DKIM > checks failing, which is obvious. For the SPF issue, I guess I could add > the IP address to the DNS record for most of the mailing lists, however, > I'm not sure what can I do to avoid the DKIM check to fail. > > Up until now, my policy is 'none' because I'm just observing and trying to > completely understand how this works, but now I'm unsure if I want to set > it to 'quarantine' or 'reject' as these list mails would be placed on Junk > mail or rejected, respectively, which makes me wonder if DMARC is adequate > for mailing lists? > > Any light shed on this will be very appreciated. > > Regards, > > Nicolás > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
