Hi Andrea, you might try chopping off the trailing "!10m" from your RUA and RUF 
fields.  Some receivers don't do a very good job parsing those.

You can plug your domain into https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-inspector/ to see if 
you've got an syntax or other errors.

Hope this helps,
=- Tim

On Sep 29, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Andrea Castelli via dmarc-discuss 
<dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone!
> 
> This is my very first message to the list, since we just started implementing 
> DMARC across the brands we manage. 
> 
> I represent a company that sends high volumes of emails, so I expected to see 
> briefly my mailbox being flooded by reports, but none of this happened.
> 
> We set up everything 7 days ago, to receive both RUA and RUF reports. So far, 
> unfortunately, we only received reports from very small ISPs (163.com, 
> x4all.nl), which is of limited use for us. Nothing from Hotmail, Gmail, 
> Yahoo...
> 
> Are you aware of any particular issue, that could explain this?
> 
> I also made a test, by sending non-authenticated emails to some test 
> addresses, (gmail, mail.ru, yahoo, hotmail, web.de), and I only received an  
> - almost immediate - report from Hotmail, nothing from the others. 
> 
> This is how our record looks:
> 
> _dmarc.example.com. IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; 
> rua=mailto:addr...@example.com!10m; ruf=mailto:addr...@example.com!10m; 
> rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400"
> 
> 
> Note that we send from a subdomain (like: email.example.com), but as far as I 
> know, this should not pose issues in receiving report. (and, again, we 
> received some).
> 
> Thank you, in advance, for your help.
> 
> Andrea Castelli


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to