Hi,

thank you Tim and Steven, it was indeed the size limit that created some
difficulties.
All the reports are now arriving correctly in a dedicated email address, I
hope we can gain some valuable insight from them.

Thank you all for the help,

Andrea

On 29 September 2014 20:17, Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:

> Welcome, Andrea.
>
> On 09/29/2014 09:58 AM, Andrea Castelli via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> > tdraegen> you might try chopping off the trailing "!10m" from your RUA
> > and RUF
> > tdraegen> fields.  Some receivers don't do a very good job parsing those.
> >
> > The rest of the record seems fine and I just removed the dimension
> > cap. Hope things will improve.
>
> If memory serves, we've seen reports from several others that the size
> limit notation causes at least a couple of the biggest Receivers to not
> emit reports. If you check the list archives, I believe I recall such a
> case within the past few months.
>
>
> > so I expected to see briefly my mailbox being flooded by reports
>
> You probably don't want to point the "ruf=" tag at anything remotely
> like a personal mailbox for the type of domains you described. And I
> generally recommend a separate "service" mailbox for each.
>
> While the number of aggregate ("rua") reports will generally max out at
> a few per receiving domain per day, the forensic reports (or whatever
> we're calling them now) vary based on who may be spoofing your domain
> (modulo anybody forwarding your messages/breaking your signatures). That
> can get very big, very suddenly. In extreme cases, like a very "popular"
> brand, it could be enough volume to seriously impact your main mailstore
> with little warning.
>
> --Steve.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to