> Sad to see that Gmail plan to move to p=reject Why do you say this? Because it will disrupt mailing lists (as in, yahoo.com refugees moved to gmail.com and now that will no longer available)?
If ARC solves the problem of mailing lists, then it means anyone with a domain with p=reject can join a mailing list (which is great, no hacky workarounds needed) and helps drive email authentication forward. -- Terry -----Original Message----- From: dmarc-discuss [mailto:dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Beverley via dmarc-discuss Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 12:36 PM To: Franck Martin; Mark Rousell Cc: dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 10:19 -0700, Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss wrote: > The fun is moving to ARC > > https://dmarc.org/2015/10/global-mailbox-providers-deploying-dmarc-to-protect-users/ Sad to see that Gmail plan to move to p=reject It will be interesting to see what the scammers come up with when that happens. Let's hope ARC delivers. Andy _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
