Franck Martin wrote: > As I said earlier spamhaus and surbl has the data. The question is not > which domains to trust, but which domains not to trust.
They may or may not. (Analysing Received: headers to learn about forwarding behaviour is not an obviously important input for those organisations at present and, consequently, is something that they're probably not doing much of.) I'd suggest that the important question is whether they're likely to be willing to publish data to support ARC-enabled DMARC decision-making once (a) good ways of doing so are known and (b) fast-moving pieces that are worth delivering this way have been identified. I'd guess "yes", but we're not yet at the point where we know that either of those assumptions is true. - Roland _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
